Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Joseph De Rivera et al v. City of Hope National Medical Center
as 2:2024cv03573
Plaintiff:
Joseph De Rivera, Irwin Ojeda and dAmileau Baulk
Defendant:
City of Hope National Medical Center dba City of Hope and City of Hope National Medical Center doing business as City of Hope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rivera v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Rivera
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freedom Pfaendler v. Sahuarita, Town of, et al
as 23-15412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREEDOM CHRISTOPHER AUS PFAENDLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SAHUARITA, TOWN OF, JOHN GEORGE, JOSEPH A. RIVERA and others
Joseph Rivera v. Brian Eller
as 22-5792
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN ELLER, Warden
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05846
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHASE RIVERA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEMOS v. 3M COMPANY, et al
as 3:2020cv05769
Plaintiff:
MARK SEMOS and JOSEPH CHASE RIVERA
Defendant:
DOES and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Semos et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2020cv07125
Plaintiff:
Mark Semos and Joseph Chase Rivera
Defendant:
3M Company and Does One Through Ten, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfaendler v. Sahuarita, Town of et al
as 4:2020cv00188
Defendant:
Sahuarita, Town of, Samuel Almodova, John George and others
Plaintiff:
Freedom Christopher Austin Pfaendler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Rivera v. USA
as 3:2018cv01195
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Rivera-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ALICEA et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN ALICEA , RUBIN ALICEA, JR. , WILLIAM F. ARMSTRONG and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
