Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Marino et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03573
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marino and Karen Marino
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marino et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv08465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marino and Karen Marino
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Depuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION v. MARINO et al
as 2:2010cv01631
Plaintiff:
STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION
Defendant:
C. JOSEPH MARINO and PATRICIA W. MARINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. MARINO WHITE O'FARRELL & GONZALEZ et al
as 3:2010cv05820
Plaintiff:
CARTER STEPHENS
Defendant:
MARINO WHITE O'FARRELL & GONZALEZ, JOHN JOSEPH MARINO, MARK ALLEN CRESON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Marino v. Three Lower Counties, Community Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03027
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marino
Defendant:
Three Lower Counties, Community Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Jefferson v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv07155
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jefferson
Defendant:
George Bush, George Bush, Jr., Dick Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jefferson v. Bush, et al
as 3:2007cv00970
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jefferson
Defendant:
George Bush, Bob Dole, George Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv04703
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jefferson
Defendant:
George Bush, Bob Dole, George Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cintas Corporation v. Amott et al
as 3:2006cv05120
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Troy Amott, Warren Bickmeyer, George Bodenmiller and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
