Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Martin et al v. Williamson et al
as 3:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin, Sr, Jennifer Vandiver, K. M. and others
Defendant:
Frank Williamson, Bryce Graham, Jr, Angela Hulsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rush v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rush
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUSHING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RUSHING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AITKEN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03944
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN AITKEN, EDWIN AMONG, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aitken et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01758
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aitken, Edwin Among, Christopher Anderson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
RUSHING v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant:
DUNN, FRENCH, WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RUSHING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHING v. NORRIS et al
as 1:2020cv02869
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RUSHING
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC. and NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSHING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv99719
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RUSHING
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. Harbin et al
as 3:2015cv01154
Plaintiff:
James C Spencer
Defendant:
William Harbin, Darrell A Harbin, Kerry D Harbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Mace-Leibson et al
as 1:2014cv02316
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Thomas
Defendant:
Ellen Mace-Leibson, David Steffan, Joseph Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
