Cases 41 - 50 of 191
Enloe v. Smith
as 2:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Joshua James Enloe
Respondent:
Randy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARVIDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03979
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES ARVIDSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARPENTER v. KNAPP
as 3:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARPENTER
Defendant:
JOSHUA JAMES KNAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Laurel County Correctional Center et al
as 6:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Collins
Defendant:
Laurel County Correctional Center, Austin Abner, Travis Cathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koonce v. Satterfield et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Koonce
Defendant:
Joseph Z. Satterfield, Russell David Oliver, Carl Hefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scolman v. La Voie et al
as 2:2021cv01435
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Scolman
Defendant:
Daniel La Voie, Hanna Utter and Lori J Wachholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03267
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., OATH KEEPERS, RYAN ASHLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
USA v. Joshua Moore
as 21-6168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA JAMES MOORE
REILLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02881
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES REILLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. James et al
as 1:2021cv00677
Plaintiff:
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Joshua James, Brandy Kennamore, Ebenezer Collado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
