Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Judith Davis v. Charter Communications of California, LLC
as 5:2015cv01302
Defendant:
Charter Communications of California, LLC
Plaintiff:
Judith Davis
Davis-Scott v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2014cv12874
Plaintiff:
Judith Davis-Scott
Defendant:
City of Brockton , David Delehoy , Steven Lopes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Ethicon, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv28043
Plaintiff:
Judith Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-51382
Plaintiff:
William Davis and Judith Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Davis et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51382
Plaintiff:
William Davis and Judith Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv05873
Plaintiff:
Alan Davis and Judith Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08561
Plaintiff:
Judith Davis and Theron Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davies v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03156
Plaintiff:
Judith Davies
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2011cv03313
Plaintiff:
JUDITH DAVIS and MICHAEL MICKALIGER
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 1:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
JUDITH DAVIS and MICHAEL MICKALIGER
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
