Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Martin v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv07347
Plaintiff:
Estate of Judith Martin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Monsanto Company
as 0:2019cv02639
Plaintiff:
Estate of Judith Martin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Martin v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2016cv00574
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Judith Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Very Music, Inc., et al v. Kid Glove Productions, Inc., et al
as 13-56078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VERY MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, MARC DOLD, an individual and JUDITH MARTIN, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
KID GLOVE PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporaiton and CONEXION ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
Very Music, Inc., et al v. Kid Glove Productions, Inc., et al
as 13-56078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VERY MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, MARC DOLD, an individual and JUDITH MARTIN, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
KID GLOVE PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporaiton and CONEXION ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Admiral Insurance Company v. James B. Wright, Jr., PLLC et al
as 1:2012cv00251
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
James B. Wright, Jr., PLLC, James B. Wright, Jr. and Judith Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Very Music Inc et al v. Kid Glove Productions Inc et al
as 2:2012cv04891
Plaintiff:
Very Music Inc, Marc Dold and Judith Martin
Defendant:
Kid Glove Productions Inc, Conexion Entertainment Group LLC and Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Benoit et al v. Lafarge S.A. et al
as 2:2011cv01893
Plaintiff:
Richard Benoit , Carol Benoit , Jason Borowski and others
Defendant:
Lafarge S.A., Lafarge Boral Gypsum in Asia, Lafarge Onoda Gypsum in Shanghai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
