Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ramos et al v. Willert Home Products
as 3:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Julio Ramos, Margarita Bras, Conjugal Partnership, Ramos Bras and others
Defendant:
Willert Home Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50088
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33868
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JULIO RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01229
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Julio Ramos v. Dominican Republic, et al
as 19-7045
Defendant / Appellee:
Eduardo Sulman, Consul General, Jose Tomas Perz, Hon., Ambassador, John and Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Julio Ramos
RAMOS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2019cv12351
Petitioner:
JULIO RAMOS
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Orpilla et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
Michael Orpilla, Miguel Quinones, Peter Panariello and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Ramos v. Erfe et al
as 3:2018cv01582
Petitioner:
Julio Ramos
Respondent:
Scott Erfe and Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doblado et al v. Oak Commercial Construction, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Denis Doblado and Julio Ramos
Defendant:
Oak Commercial Construction, L.L.C. , Aaron Zappas and Neal Beakey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
