Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Davis v. Cooper et al
as 7:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Tevin Edward Davis
Defendant:
Sgt. L. Cooper, Capt. Baitert, Capt. Jonathan Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferebee v. Skinner et al
as 7:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Skinner, S. Birman, S. Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyler v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jevon Rasheed Moyler
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison and K. M. Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maybush et al v. Putze et al
as 3:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Ronald Maybush and K. M.
Defendant:
Peggy Putze and Putze's Mobile Home Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Sprouse v. Jana et al
as 7:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Sprouse
Defendant:
Dr. Timothy Jana, Kaplinger, Brandan Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. Capt. Covington
as 21-7438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPT. COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR., KATY POOLE and others
McCoy v. Calloway et al
as 4:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Anton Bell, R. J. Bruner, S. N. Salang and others
Plaintiff:
Anita M. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lacey v. Todd et al
as 1:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Emerald Frieason, K. M. Gross, Hanna Lidington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
