Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Abbott et al v. Tower Hills Prime Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Charles K Abbott and Evie Abbott
Defendant:
Tower Hills Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(PC) Beggs v. South et al
as 2:2021cv02190
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jo Beggs
Defendant:
H. South, K. Abbott and Naseer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J. H.'s Power of Attorney v. Yotter et al
as 6:2021cv06250
Defendant:
Richard E. Updegrove, Kendra DiTullio, Traci Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
J.H.'s Power of Attorney and J. H.'s Power of Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Wallace v. Zachary Fardon, et al
as 20-3194
Defendant / Appellee:
David Randolph Mercer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael D. Smith, Warden, Zachary P. Fardon, US Assistant Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Wallace
Wallace v. Fardon et al
as 6:2020cv03280
Defendant:
Dr. Tyner, Dr. Sarrazin, Michael D. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R Wallace
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennifer Abbott-Pope v. Texas Recovery Bureau, Inc., et al
as 16-41258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER K. ABBOTT-POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INCORPORATED and SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED
Abbott v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv08040
Petitioner:
J K Abbott, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: J Abbott, Jr.
as 16-11731
Petitioner:
In re: J. K. ABBOTT, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abbott v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2015cv00591
Petitioner:
J. K. Abbott, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
