Cases 1 - 10 of 122
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. OBERLANDER et al.
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT D. OBERLANDER, E. DEPUTY MONGELLOZZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brownlee v. Burnes et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Justin Brownlee
Defendant:
J. Burnes, K. Clark, M. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brownlee v. Burnes et al
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Justin Brownlee
Defendant:
J. Burnes, K. Clark, M. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) King v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Larry Louis King
Defendant:
K. Clark, M. A. Mason, J. Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holley v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
as 9:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Holley, Jr.
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center, Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hudkins v. Clark
as 1:2022cv00375
Petitioner:
Timothy D. Hudkins
Respondent:
K. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MERIS v. SOUTHERN
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
LARRY MERIS
Defendant:
J.P. SOUTHERN, CUPID, K. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Clarke v. SCSO et al
as 2:2022cv00026
Petitioner:
Lee K. Clarke and Lee Kelly Clarke
Respondent:
SCSO and People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
