Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Zito v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv10047
Plaintiff: Thomas J. Zito
Defendant: Sean K. Collins and William A. Gottlieb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Zito v. Collins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff: Thomas J. Zito
Defendant: Sean K. Collins and William A. Gottlieb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02637
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Collins v. Hartford City Of et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff: Katherine K Collins
Defendant: Scott Melley, Jack Douglas Beckly, Aaron Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEARY v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04514
Plaintiff: ANGEL M. LEARY
Defendant: PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAPP v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv04267
Plaintiff: JASON SAPP
Defendant: PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PAUL MICCINILLI, JEFFERY HUNTINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Mccallum et al
as 1:2011cv02947
Plaintiff: Darron K Collins
Defendant: Richard Mccallum , Evan Komosa and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01265
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02684
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?