Cases 1 - 10 of 100
TOBIN v. CRANKFIELD et al
as 5:2026cv00207
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW A TOBIN
Defendant:
MS CRANKFIELD, A DOSECK and MS DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. Onstott
as 2:2026cv12560
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Hutchins
Defendant:
Onstott
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Greene v. Malman Law et al
as 1:2026cv08884
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya Ameera Greene
Defendant:
Malman Law, Steve Malman, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04192
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01906
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hennelly et al v. City of Fort Lauderdale, a Florida Municipal corporation et al
as 0:2026cv62060
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hennelly and Diane Hennelly
Defendant:
City of Fort Lauderdale, a Florida Municipal corporation and John Doe Corporation, an unknown third-party meter reading vendor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05955
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
