Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00065
Plaintiff: Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant: Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Receiver: Carl F. Jenkins
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00194
Plaintiff: Global Naps, Inc.
Defendant: Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al
as 2:2010mc00008
Plaintiff: Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant: Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington and others
Receiver: Carl F. Jenkins
Shabazz v. Pataki
as 10-1899
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael A.Z. Shabazz, AKA Michael Hurley
Defendant - Appellee: George Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Anthony J. Annuci, Deputy Commissioner and counsel and others
Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff: Deborah K Manning and Deborah K Manning
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1309
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. MA Dept of Telecommunications, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant: 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1041
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant: 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
: , , and others
Zarif Shabazz v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv05961
Plaintiff: Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Defendant: George E. Pataki, Glenn S. Goord, Anthony J. Annuci and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?