Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Reed v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2018cv00165
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff S. Sandy, Adminstrator Michael K. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed and Matthew D. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiko Epson Corporation et al v. CIS Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06586
Defendant:
Absolute Inkjet Incorporated, Anthony K. Martin, Joseph J. Ascaridis and others
Plaintiff:
Epson Portland, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Salley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01343
Defendant:
. Massey, L.T.B. Johnson, . Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Dontaneous Salley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv01297
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff S. Sandy, Betsy Jividen and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06214
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, Michael Martin, Leroy K. Martin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Simon Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04653
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dixon v. Patterson et al
as 5:2018cv01171
Plaintiff:
Heather Dixon
Defendant:
John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 2, Jonathan Viney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Martin
as 18-937
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael K. Martin
Hollandsworth v. Martin et al
as 2:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Hollandsworth
Defendant:
Terrence K. Martin and Alan P. Krasnoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
