Cases 51 - 60 of 218
Zuri Sana-Kabisa Young v. A. Lugo et al
as 2:2019cv01313
Defendant:
A. Lugo, A Lugo, C. King and others
Plaintiff:
Zuri S K Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11660
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janice K Young and Janice Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Kahaku v. Bustamante et al
as 2:2018cv03001
Defendant:
K. Young and A. Bustamante
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kahaku
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Machado v. Bustamante et al
as 2:2018cv02943
Plaintiff:
Oscar Machado
Defendant:
K. Young, John Doe and A. Bustamante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Byington et al
as 4:2018cv03318
Defendant:
Carrie Byington and Michael K Young
Plaintiff:
Laura E Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shomo v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00916
Defendant:
Cluadia Mott, Karl Fougerson, Jane Hyland and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Shomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02292
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Unknown Cooper
Plaintiff:
Steven K Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02291
Plaintiff:
Susan K Young and Steven K Young
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Unknown Parties and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuri S K Young v. D. Avalos et al
as 2:2018cv06173
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Avalos, M. Voong and Don Ulstad
Plaintiff:
Zuri S K Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shell v. Boyd et al
as 7:2018cv00333
Defendant:
R. Walz, Heather L. Boyd, Harold C. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Lee Shell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
