Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Anderson et al v. The City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2023cv03963
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson, Heyward Bradshaw, Olante Bradshaw and others
Defendant:
The City of Mount Vernon, Det. Camilo Antonini, Sgt. Pedro Abreu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00999
Plaintiff:
Aaron Keith Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Valencia v. Santos et al
as 3:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Reynel Valencia
Defendant:
Venerio Santos, Emmanuel Afuwape, Susan Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00651
Plaintiff:
Aaron Keith Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
REYNOLDS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Defendant:
JAMES BASSINGER, STANLEY KNIGHT and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Reynolds v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 10-60681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY KEITH REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner, RUFUS BURKS and BRIAN LADNER, Associate Warden
Reynolds v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tony Keith Reynolds
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Rufus Burks, Jr., Brian Ladner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reynolds v. Sheets
as 1:2008cv01024
Petitioner:
Keith Reynolds
Respondent:
Michael Sheets
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reynolds v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2008cv00342
Petitioner:
Keith Reynolds
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reynolds v. Rice et al
as 3:2007cv00880
Petitioner:
Keith Reynolds
Defendant:
Condoleezza Rice
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Johnathan C. Miner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
