Cases 21 - 30 of 3,284
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelly Clark v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6211
Petitioner:
KELLY JAMES CLARK, JR.
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Baxter v. HII Mission Technologies Corp.
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kelly Baxter
Defendant:
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kelly v. American Bar Association
as 5:2024ct03047
Plaintiff:
Steven Kelly and Steven James Kelly
Defendant:
American Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burrows v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Other:
Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kelly T. Burrows
Defendant:
Jetro M. Ortiz, Mak Lux LLC, Mak Link LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Crittendon v. Greenville County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00681
Petitioner:
Timothy B. Crittendon
Respondent:
Greenville County Sheriff's Department, Director Greenville County Detention Center, Greenville County Solicitor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer Babs v. Orange Elephant Roofing & Construction LLC
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
SPENCER BABS, JASON DORES and NICHOLAS WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ORANGE ELEPHANT ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION LLC, d/b/a Orange Elephant Roofing & Construction and JAKE KELLY, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
