Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Williams v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff: Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant: Office of General Counsel, Alabama DHR, Barbour DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff: Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant: Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece and Sheriff Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Google LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff: Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant: Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv03738
Plaintiff: Kendrick Williams
Defendant: GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Dugas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff: Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant: Carl Smith, Darrel Vannoy, Marcus Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dugas v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff: Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant: Damon Turner, Darrel Vannoy, Christopher Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re: Kendrick Williams
as 22-200
Petitioner: In re: KENDRICK WILLIAMS
Dugas v. Vannoy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00530
Plaintiff: Ronald Jermain Dugas
Defendant: Darrel Vannoy, Carl Smith, Kendrick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Kendrick Williams
as 21-6498
Defendant / Appellant: KENDRICK WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?