Cases 21 - 30 of 159
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Appel v. Hayut
as 22-176
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ronit D. Appel
Defendant:
Hon. Esther Hayut, Yosef Meir Cohen, Hon. Yael Antebi-Sharon and others
Defendant / Appellant:
David Kazhdan
Appel v. Hayut
as 22-170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronit D. Appel
Defendant / Appellee:
Meir Amir Cohen, David Kazhdan, Hon. Esther Hayut and others
Rhodes v. Hudson Insurance Company et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Travis Rhodes
Defendant:
Hudson Insurance Company and Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82358
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis and Mary Lee Davis
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., Glaxosmithkline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Ronit D. Appel
as 21-1963
Petitioner:
Ronit D. Appel
Respondent:
Hon. Esther Hayut, Yosef Meir Cohen, Hon. Yael Antebi-Sharon and others
Mallett v. Davis et al
as 3:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mallett
Defendant:
Kenneth Davis, John K Sparks, Jr, Richard E Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29426
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26307
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Dallas Child Support
as 21-10540
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Burton, Indiidual Official Capacity Attorney/Agent Contractor for Dallas County CSEA, Tanner Joy Feast, Individual Official Capacity Court Reporter Contractor for 254th Title IV-D Court, Dallas County Texas Child Support Enforcement Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
