Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Robert Frazier v. Prince Georges County
as 24-1380
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Potter v. Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, et al
as 2:2023cv06456
Plaintiff:
Philip G. Potter
Defendant:
Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach, Village Building Department, Village Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Potter v. Inc. Village of Ocean Beach et al
as 1:2023cv06456
Plaintiff:
Philip G. Potter
Defendant:
Inc. Village of Ocean Beach, Inc. Village of Ocean Beach Building Dept., Inc. Village of Ocean Beach Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robert Frazier v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 23-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Plaintiff:
DONNELL DAVIS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, LESLIE SHARP, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ELMER LAGUAN-SALINAS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Defendant:
LAKEECIA RENEE ALLEN, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, BRYON BEREANO, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, JOHN BIELEC, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County and others
Gray v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2022cv01398
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gray
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Ryan Nottingham, Teri A Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Frazier et al v. Prince Georges County, Maryland et al
as 8:2022cv01768
Plaintiff:
Robert Frazier, Anibal Hernandez, D.P. and others
Defendant:
Prince Georges County, Maryland, Corenne Labbe, Jeffrey Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL et al v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
MIKAL S. MITCHELL, KAL SHAREEF EL, SERGIO ROSADO and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY, DAVID KELSEY, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Gray v. City of Claremont
as 2:2021cv08011
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gray
Defendant:
City of Claremont, Claremont Police Department, Brad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
