Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Cox v. Caley, et al
as 21-1201
Respondent / Appellee:
ED CALEY, Warden of the Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH J. COX
Cox v. Caley, et al
as 21-1115
Respondent / Appellee:
ED CALEY, Warden of the Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH J. COX
Cox v. Caley et al
as 1:2020cv03272
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Ed Caley
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02796
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Todd Cox
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40887
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TERRY COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crane et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv06080
Plaintiff:
Patsy Anderson, Glenda Colvin, Richard Dushion and others
Defendant:
FCA U.S., LLC, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crane et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12485
Plaintiff:
Patsy Anderson, Glenda Colvin, Richard Dushion and others
Defendant:
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cox v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2019cv00542
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2019cv02121
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cox v. Romero et al
as 1:2018cv01040
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Cox
Defendant:
Mike Romero, Rick Raemisch, Carol Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
