Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nash v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv10105
Plaintiff: Kenneth Nash
Defendant: Dennis Ward and Kelley Vugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby NashIn re: Bobby Nash
as 21-5134
Respondent: TONY MAYS
Petitioner: In re: BOBBY KENNETH NASH
NASH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04628
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: KENNETH NASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLINS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03324
Plaintiff: JACOB PHILLIPS, DAVID MURZYNSKI, KORI NEWBELL and others
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mullins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02216
Plaintiff: Jacob Phillips, David Murzynski, Kori Newbell and others
Defendant: Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04160
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Kopatz v. McMullen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00171
Plaintiff: Brian Kopatz
Defendant: Virgil McMullen, Sandey Vencent, James . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01972
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NASH et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02849
Defendant: INDIANA STATE POLICE, STATE OF INDIANA, PETER STEPHEN and others
Plaintiff: KENNETH NASH and TAMMY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Days v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv03143
Plaintiff: Frank Joseph Days
Defendant: Brad Livingston, William (Bill) Stephens, Charely Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?