Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Big Horn County Electric Coope v. Alden Big Man, et al
as 21-35223
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH PITT, Honorable Chief Justice; Justice of the Crow Court of Appeals, ALDEN BIG MAN, MICHELLE WILSON, Honorable Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BIG HORN COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Montana Corporation
PITTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05230
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KANAAN KENNETH PITTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PICKENS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03221
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. PRICE, SCOTT ROE, DAVID RILEY and others
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pickens et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02201
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Price, Scott Roe, David Riley and others
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo, LLC, 3M Company and others
Pitts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09041
Plaintiff:
Peaches Pitts and Kenneth Pitts
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
