Cases 31 - 40 of 368
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Collins
as 9:2022cv01405
Petitioner:
Kenneth Williams
Respondent:
Christopher S. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Haisch v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01314
Petitioner:
Kenneth William Haisch
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clarence Harris v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE ELLIOTT HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY, CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE and others
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13344
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM THORNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHRADER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12099
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM SCHRADER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Kenneth Kirkland
as 22-10195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH WILLIAM KIRKLAND
Kaufman v. Debottis
as 9:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman and Kenneth W. Kaufman
Defendant:
Debottis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
