Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huston et al v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Celtic Cowgirl Inc, The, Tina Huston and Black Kettle Ranch
Defendant:
Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Cameron (USA)
as 24-257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER T. DUPONT
Defendant:
ERIN CAMERON, EMMANUEL C. HUMPHREY and MARY KETTLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Kettle Range Conservation Group v. US Forest Service, et al
as 23-35548
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP
Defendant / Appellant:
US FOREST SERVICE, GLENN CASAMASSA, Pacific Northwest Regional Forester, US Forest Service, RODNEY SMOLDON, Forest Supervisor, Colville National Forest and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
