Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Barnes et al v. RMS Protective Services et al
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Barnes, Gerald Behan, Michael Donald and others
Defendant:
RMS Protective Services, Mithras Protective Services, Inc., Lyndon Brentnall and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
CHUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17361
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. D.P.S, NC Corr
as 1:2020cv00104
Defendant:
D.P.S. NC State Agency Institution and Board, Clarence Stewart, D.P.S., NC Corr and others
Plaintiff:
Delmar Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson Moore v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-6360
Defendant / Appellee:
TIERRA CATLETT, SGT. SHEPARD, KATY POOLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENSON MOORE
Moore v. Lassiter et al
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
FNU Slater, FNU Ayscue, Norma Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Benson Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2019cv00774
Defendant:
NORMA MELTON, KENNETH LASSITER, JEFFERY PATANE and others
Plaintiff:
BENSON MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sung Kang v. Yongho Kim et al
as 2:2018cv04822
Defendant:
Kevin Chung, Does and Yongho Kim
Plaintiff:
Sung Kang
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC. et al
as 1:2016cv07897
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC. , EUGENE COSENTINO , SHAWN ATKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chung v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv62412
Plaintiff:
Kevin Chung
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Kevin Chung
as 16-15479
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN CHUNG
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
