Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Christian Narkiewicz-Laine v. Kevin Doyle, et al
as 18-2535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTIAN K. NARKIEWICZ-LAINE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN DOYLE, PAMELA DOYLE, JOHN T. DOYLE TRUST A and others
Bradley v. Northam et al
as 3:2018cv00479
Defendant:
Kevin Doyle, David E. Brown, Ralph Northam and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Palmer et al
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Doyle Palmer and LTR Auto, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Doyle v. Concord Township, Elkhart County, Indiana, et al
as 3:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kevin Doyle
Defendant:
Concord Township, Elkhart County, Indiana and Trustee, Concord Township, Elkhart County, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Doyle
as 3:2016cv01427
Petitioner:
Blake Warner
Respondent:
Kevin Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner v. Dalling et al
as 3:2016cv01426
Plaintiff:
Blake Warner
Defendant:
Kerry Dalling, Daniel Hallama, Melanie Cradle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2014cv14277
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Kevin Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Diaz v. Best et al
as 1:2014cv07207
Plaintiff:
Daniel V. Diaz
Defendant:
Charles Best, John Hurst, LT. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv12916
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Kevin Doyle
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. BRISTOL MANOR HEALTHCARE CENTER
as 1:2012cv01904
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , STEPHEN ABRECHT , ROD BASHIR and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL MANOR HEALTHCARE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
