Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Robert Letskus, Jr. v. KVC Group, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Robert Letskus, Jr.
Defendant:
KVC Group, LLC doing business as National Credit Partners, Prime Legal Firm, Denise Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kim Vo v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM VO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Department of Corrections, LONNIE OLIVER, Superintendent SCI Cmbridge Springs, CORRECTIONS OFFICER M. MCCURDY and others
Letskus v. KVC Group, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01893
Defendant:
Kim Vo, Denise Ho, Prime Legal Firm and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Letskus, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
VO v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00084
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT LONNIE OLIVER and DOC SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
KIM VO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
New York Life Insurance Company v. Ho et al
as 5:2018cv06857
Defendant:
Dung Ho and Thanh Kim Vo
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vo v. Tritten et al
as 0:2016cv03059
Plaintiff:
Lien Kim Vo
Defendant:
Leslie D. Tritten , David Douglas , Jeb C. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Immigration and Nationality Act
Progressive Medical Laser, Ltd. et al LLC v. Dermagenix, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv03489
Plaintiff:
William G Learn, III and Progressive Medical Laser, Ltd.
Defendant:
Dermagenix, LLC and Hoa Kim Vo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Vo v. Gore
as 1:2010cv00604
Petitioner:
Cuc Kim Vo
Respondent:
William D. Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nguyen et al v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2009cv02054
Plaintiff:
Tam Minh Nguyen and Hoang Kim Vo
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Department of Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
