Cases 41 - 50 of 60
ROY v. USA GOVT et al
as 2:2012cv04857
Plaintiff:
KKK ROY
Defendant:
USA GOVT, PIYADI BHATSCHAPPE, M ZYSINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02229
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Tyrone Hurt v. State of Alabama, et al
as 12-2856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT, (See Haines v. Kerner, 1972)
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al and KKK, et al
HURT v. THE STATE OF ALABAMA et al
as 2:2012cv03451
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA and KKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hurt v. The White Aryon Resistance of the State of California, the KKK
as 3:2012cv03141
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
The White Aryon Resistance of the State of California, the KKK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HURT v. BIRMINGHAM'S SIXTEENTH 16TH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH et al
as 2:2012cv01900
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
BIRMINGHAM'S SIXTEENTH 16TH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH and KKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROY v. REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITEE OF USA et al
as 2:2012cv01371
Plaintiff:
KKK ROY
Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITEE OF USA, USA GOVT and FACEBOOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MUINA v. KKK
as 4:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
JANTONIO RAFER TONY MUINA
Defendant:
KKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muina et al v. KKK The Menegels Hitlers Van Floid Michael Lister Leebs et al
as 1:2011cv24626
Plaintiff:
Jaraf Antonio Muina, Kathy Muina, Willy Muina and others
Defendant:
KKK The Menegels Hitlers Van Floid Michael Lister Leebs, Cheif of Police The Lamar Curries, KKKCrozz Jack Glasss The Bozzco Ed Ball South Briggs Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy et al v. USA Govt
as 8:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
Conglomerate 2, Jungle Demupods and Rev. KKK Roy
Defendant:
USA Govt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
