Cases 1 - 10 of 1,061
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
XELUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
TUSHKHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pamela Krause v. City of Hope
as 2:2024cv02894
Plaintiff:
Pamela Krause
Defendant:
City of Hope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Davenport, Fred v. Steingraeber, Brooke et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Brooke Steingraeber, Kyle Ferstl, Jane Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Fuchs et al
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Tyrus L Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Larry Fuchs, Glass, Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrival v. Pennington County et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Amber Pirraglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krause v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02560
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Krause
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00659
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Padma Rao v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
PADMA RAO
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and KIEFER KRAUSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
