Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Cartagena et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08711
Plaintiff:
Israel Cartagena, Annieli Acevedo, Maryalice Alston-Harris and others
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03944
Plaintiff:
KAREN ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Musser v. County of Lawrence, IL et al
as 3:2023cv02814
Plaintiff:
Donald Musser
Defendant:
County of Lawrence, IL, Russell Adams, Trenton Masterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIZZEL v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GRIZZEL
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ABBY BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAMOS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLOREZ RAMOS
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNELL v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE CONNELL, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS and SHERIFF VAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
DAVEN WAYNE ADAMS
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02781
Plaintiff:
KAREN ADAMS
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06482
Plaintiff:
KAREN ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
