Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Stewart v. Harris et al
as 5:2023ct03159
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stewart
Defendant:
Brandeshawn Harris, Peter Buchholtz, Daryll Vann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Patterson v. Captain Karen Henderson
as 23-6501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER O'NEAL PATTERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN HENDERSON, DANIEL BARNES, CHRISTOPHER OXENDINE and others
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FAISON and JOHN DOE
Harris Ford v. Erik Hooks
as 21-7647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRIS EMANUEL FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS, KENNETH E. LASSITER, KATY POOLE and others
CLARK v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, CHRIS RICH, CAPTAIN KAREN HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2019cv00444
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY, LIEUTENANT KAREN HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS EMANUEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Skyview Satellite Networks, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00528
Plaintiff:
Karen Henderson
Defendant:
Skyview Satellite Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BECTON v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
NAKIA AUDRELL BECTON
Defendant:
KAREN HENDERSON and RUCHELLE BROOKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. International Paper Company et al
as 1:2017cv00105
Defendant:
International Paper Company, H.O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. and Bay Area Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adams, David K. Dock, Mary Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breeland v. Henderson et al
as 0:2016cv03048
Plaintiff:
Marquis Breeland
Defendant:
Karen Henderson, Laster Baker, Johnny Evry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hills v. Aubrey
as 8:2016cv02731
Plaintiff:
LeArthur Hills
Defendant:
Aubrey Rennick, David Mungo and Karen Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
