Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Derrick v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv12491
Plaintiff:
Cory Odell Derrick
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc., Viapath Technologies, Inc., Keefe Commisary Network and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reese et al v. Access SecurePak et al
as 1:2020cv00547
Plaintiff:
Tommie Blackmon and Mark Reese
Defendant:
Access SecurePak, HIG Capital, Keefe Commisary Network, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Gurney et al
as 1:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Keefe Commisary Network, Patrick J. Gurney and P. Howard
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cofield et al v. Keefe Corp. et al
as 4:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Keefe Corp., Keefe Group, Inc., Keefe Commisary Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radcliffe v. Keefe Commisary Network et al
as 1:2015cv02582
Plaintiff:
William Radcliffe
Defendant:
Keefe Commisary Network and Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Cook County Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv08354
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Patrick
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections and Keefe Commisary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Keefe Commisary Network Sales et al
as 1:2012cv05033
Plaintiff:
Rahsaan E. Edwards
Defendant:
Keefe Commisary Network Sales and Sheriff of Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Countryman v. Access SeewePak Keefe Commissary/Network, LLC
as 3:2012cv00253
Defendant:
Access SecurePac Keefe Commisary Network, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ralph Countryman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marchant v. Dennehy et al
as 1:2007cv10031
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Marchant
Defendant:
Kathleen Dennehy, Robert Murphy, David Brouillette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
