Cases 1 - 10 of 369
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keene v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Jimmie E. Keene
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. Keen
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Walton
Defendant:
Daniel Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farland Gilliehan v. St. Charles County Court, et al
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
Farland L. Gilliehan
Defendant:
St. Charles County Circuit Court, St. Charles County Jail, Dan Keen, St. Charles County Jail Director and others
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. State of Alaska, Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Keen L.A. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Courts, Alaska State Trooper Agency and Timothy Cronin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Keen v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keen
Defendant:
Cross and S. Wailace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOYON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
RYAN R DOYON and RYAN ROBERT DOYON
Defendant:
MR RICKY DIXON, MR KEEN, TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keene v. Salazar et al
as 5:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Karl Keene
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar, Sgt. FNU De Los Santos, Cpl. M. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
