Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robertson v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson and Keith Wayne Robertson
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and Asst Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. East et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson
Defendant:
Jean Ann East, H Lynn Jones, III, Shelby Wambsgans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
John Robertson and John Keith Robertson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Miller et al v. Quartzview, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller, The Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc., Hugh Dan O'Neill III and others
Defendant:
Quartzview, Inc., Roger Haas, Simon P. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Robertson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 1:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 US as Defendant
Keith Robertson v. Comptroller of Maryland
as 21-1064
Appellee:
COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND
Trustee:
MARC H. BAER
Debtor:
KEITH ROBERTSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01876
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Robertson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv02287
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officers "John Doe" #1-20 and P.O. Christopher Signorile
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andonian et al v. Canyon Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01854
Plaintiff:
Jacques Godbout, Lina Pagliuca, Clause Dexradeur and others
Defendant:
Canyon Acquisitions International, LLC, Canyon Acquisitions, LLC and Copal Resort Development Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
