Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Stevens et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keith Stevens, Sr. and Judy Stevens
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Stevens v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv14322
Plaintiff:
Keith Stevens
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43885
Plaintiff:
MAURICE KEITH STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Arbuckle et al
as 2:2017cv02385
Plaintiff:
Keith Steven Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher Arbuckle, Darren Anderson, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. Arbuckle et al
as 2:2017at01217
Plaintiff:
Keith Steven Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher Arbuckle, Darren Anderson, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stevens v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00421
Defendant:
State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Keith Stevens
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
TOMPKINS v. POOLE et al
as 1:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
KATIE POOLE, WILLIAM BULLARD, JERRY INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. PERRY et al
as 1:2014cv00806
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON, KATIE POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Farris et al
as 5:2014cv00705
Petitioner:
Bradley Keith Stevens
Respondent:
Jim Farris and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
