Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
F. v. Carter County Board of Education et al
as 0:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
B. F.
Defendant:
Carter County Board of Education and Kelley Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Moore v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv04309
Plaintiff:
Kelley Moore
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kirkpatrick v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al .
as 4:2010cv01239
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Co. , Babcock Borsig Power, Inc. , Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Moore Kirkpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Moore, et al v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kelley Moore and Lynne E. Moore
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
DOBSON v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93182
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. DOBSON and SHIELA J. DOBSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KETCHIE v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93183
Plaintiff:
JIMMY M. KETCHIE and SHIRLEY M. KETCHIE
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LYNN et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93188
Plaintiff:
WILLIE M. LYNN
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
