Cases 1 - 10 of 20
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harpo, Inc. v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv06787
Plaintiff:
Harpo, Inc.
Defendant:
KELLIE CARTER JACKSON, LEAH WRIGHT RIGUEUR and ROULETTE PRODUCTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CARTER v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2022cv01609
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
KELLY CARTER
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aiken v. Coleman et al
as 5:2019cv00057
Defendant:
Rebbecca Gray, Janice Brady, Daisy Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Junior Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. US
as 19-1473
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT KELLY CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Bunch v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
Jerry Howell and Childress
Plaintiff:
Kelly Carter Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv13204
Plaintiff:
Kelly Carter
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Carter et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2016cv05132
Plaintiff:
Kelly Carter and Willie Tinoifili
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Ryan Swetavage and FNU Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
Donna Madison , Timothy Craig Tetley , Kelly Carter and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
