Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kelly Rodgers v. Fenton Area Public Schools, et al
as 26-1275
Plaintiff:
KELLY RODGERS
Defendant:
FENTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, GEARUP2LEAD, WINSTON STOODY and others
Rodgers v. Fenton Area Public Schools et al
as 2:2023cv13110
Plaintiff:
Kelly Rodgers
Defendant:
Fenton Area Public Schools, Gearup2lead, Adam Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. AEP Industries et al
as 1:2013cv04868
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brown
Defendant:
AEP Industries and Kelly Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rodgers v. Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida et al
as 6:2011cv02025
Plaintiff:
Kelly Rodgers
Defendant:
Sheriff of Brevard County, Florida , Matthew Swartz , Maria Fernez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Faulkenberry v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Justin Faulkenberry
Defendant:
Kelly Rodgers and RM Compton Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louise Davenport v. Candace Fabri, et al
as 11-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUISE DAVENPORT
Defendant - Appellee:
CANDACE J. FABRI, JOHN KWON, LISA ELLIS and others
RODGERS v. THE LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
KELLY RODGERS
Defendant:
THE LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, LLC and JOHN DOES (I-III)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davenport et al v. Fabri et al
as 1:2011cv02010
Plaintiff:
Louise Davenport
Defendant:
Candace J Fabri, John Kwon, Lisa Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv00857
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rodgers and Kelly Rodgers
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe #1 et al v. Terrell Independent School District et al
as 3:2010cv00578
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Defendant:
Terrell Independent School District and Kelly Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
