Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Washington v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Washington
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
Jack L. Townsend, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Kelvin Washington v. United States
as 23-1840
Petitioner:
Kelvin Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Washington v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv02439
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Washington
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv03213
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kelvin Washington, Sr. v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 15-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN WASHINGTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Washington v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 1:2013cv00045
Petitioner:
Kelvin Washington
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Washington
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Washington v. Quillen et al
as 1:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Washington
Defendant:
Angela Quillen , Ferrell Jordan , Brigette Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
WASHINGTON v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv01978
Petitioner:
KELVIN WASHINGTON, SR
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv01184
Petitioner:
KELVIN WASHINGTON, SR
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
