Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Thomas v. William et al
as 2:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deshawn L Thomas
Defendant:
Ken William, James Dzurenda and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez Morales v. Benson et al
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez Morales
Defendant:
J. Benson, Villegas, Christy Coss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higa v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Christopher Higa
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NDOC, Ken Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv01300
Plaintiff:
Jerry V. Butler
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Ken Williams, f/n/u Hearbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeanlouis v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2012cv00694
Defendant:
Unknown Blade, N. Burl Cain, Jason Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Jeanlouis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Shumate et al
as 3:2012cv01257
Plaintiff:
Ken Williams
Defendant:
Mark Shumate, John Doe, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heidelberg v. City of Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jerome Heidelberg
Defendant:
City of Mobile Police Department, Ken Williams, James Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ken Williams v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 11-30214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, RICHARD STALDER, STEVE RADER and others
Matthews v. Shank et al
as 3:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
Sidney Matthews
Defendant:
Myron Shank and Ken Williams
Interested_party:
Interested Party State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv02217
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Bernard Terry
Defendant:
WT Johnson, CAPT Mullins and Ken Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
