Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Morris v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00517
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Morris
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debra Morris, et al v. Global Asset Protection Svc, et al
as 19-40047
Undetermined:
DEBRA MORRIS, Individually and as representative of the Estate of Kenneth W. Morris, ASHLEY BIALOWAS, formerly known as Ashley Morris, ORLANDO ORDAZ and others
Kenneth Morris v. Warden, et al
as 18-12966
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH E. MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and WARDEN
In re: Kenneth Morris
as 18-11393
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. MORRIS
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BALDEO et al v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2018cv05359
Plaintiff:
STACEY BALDEO and SIRRANO KEITH BALDEO
Defendant:
COUNCILMAN MOHAMMED AKHTARUZZAMAN, COUNCILMAN MICHAEL MIKE JACKSON, COUNCILMAN LUIS VELEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Ingram et al (MAG+)
as 1:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Morris
Defendant:
Lori Collier Ingram, LaDonna B. Spivey and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Kirishian Oriental Rugs, Inc v. A Advanced Carpet Cleaning & Restoration, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
Richard Kirishian Oriental Rugs, Inc
Defendant:
A Advanced Carpet Cleaning & Restoration, Inc, Kenneth Deane Morris and Lori A Morris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P. Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morris v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2016cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Morris
Defendant:
Karla Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2015cv02082
Petitioner:
Kenneth A. Morris
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
