Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Adams v. C. et al
as 1:2012cv01916
Petitioner:
Kevin Adams
Respondent:
Johnson C. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gandy v. City of Bay Minette, Alabama
as 1:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adam Gandy
Defendant:
City of Bay Minette, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adams
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does 1-5 and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2011cv02598
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adams
Defendant:
John Wolfe and Attorney General for the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv04942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sean Payton, et al. v. Knauf Gips KG, et al.
as LAE/2:09-CV-07628
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONROY, Thomas Cox, Michelle Egan and others
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG and Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD.
Petitioner:
Thaddeus L. Hunter and Ronald Joachim
Rogers et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
William Bart Ziegler, Joyce W. Rogers, Jose Acosta and others
Defendant:
Standard Pacific of Tampa GP, Inc., Summit Homes, LLC, Woodside and others
Cross Defendant:
Knauf Insulation GMBH and Knauf Plasterboard Wuhu Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Whitney National Bank v. Labry et al
as 2:2009cv02518
Plaintiff:
Whitney National Bank and Whitney National Bank
Defendant:
Edward A. Labry, III, William B. Benton, Jr. and J. Kevin Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
