Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robinson v. Frick et al
as 7:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Robinson
Defendant:
Sgt. Frick, Issac Wood, Patrick Co. Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamm v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Lamm
Defendant:
United States of America, Mr. McCrae, Ms. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughlin et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03302
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brad McLaughlin, Terry Raymond McCall, Douglas Wayne McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Staples, Bey v. Parsons et al
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Parsons, Sargent Kevin Allen, W. M. Tanzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bainbridge v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Bainbridge
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25798
Plaintiff:
Sharon T. Allen and Kevin Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pressly v. Kaberna et al
as 2:2010cv02204
Plaintiff:
Anna Truitt Pressly
Defendant:
Kevin Allen Kaberna and 28.5 foot Sea Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Kevin Key v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7063
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN ALLEN KEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of The Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Key v. Johnson
as 2:2009cv00600
Petitioner:
Kevin Allen Key
Respondent:
Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
