Cases 11 - 20 of 22
PARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04250
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78897
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Park v. Cole Haan, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01422
Plaintiff:
Kevin Park
Defendant:
Cole Haan, LLC and Apax Partners Worldwide, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Maradiaga et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv08325
Plaintiff:
Jeronimo Maradiaga , Cosme Del Rosario-Bell , Randolph Carr and others
Defendant:
City of New York , Kevin Cox, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ryan Corley, Samuel Frank, Nicholas Corpuz and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. National Guard Bureau et al
as 2:2014cv01282
Plaintiff:
Graciela M. Contreras
Defendant:
National Guard Bureau, Frank J Grass, Charles T Hagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Park v. Webloyalty.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kevin Park
Defendant:
Webloyalty.com, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBLES v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBLES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PRISON BOARD INSPECTOR, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
