Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners for Creek County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
Margaret Johnson
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Creek County, Oklahoma , Steve Toliver , Randall Arnold, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Gray v. Moses Ector, et al
as 12-11323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MOSES ECTOR, Chief of Police of Hogansville, JEFFREY SHEPPARD, Investigator, Police Department City of Hogansville, RAYMOND GATES, Police Department, City of Hogansville and others
Bateman v. Jamaludeen et al
as 2:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Michael Bateman
Defendant:
Jamaludeen, Jane Doe and Kevin Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Ector et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Charles Gray
Defendant:
Moses Ector , Jeffrey Sheppard , Raymond Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingus v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2010cv00435
Plaintiff:
De'Ossie Dingus
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Safety, Tennessee Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chamberlain v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2007cv01154
Plaintiff:
George Chamberlain
Defendant:
County of Orange, Kevin Taylor, Jason Chapluk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARION v. THE CITY OF CORYDON, INDIANA et al
as 4:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
TRENT MARION, TRENT MARION and TRENT MARION
Defendant:
THE CITY OF CORYDON, INDIANA, THE CITY OF CORYDON, INDIANA, THE CITY OF CORYDON, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
