Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Cruz et al v. Resolute Capital Partners LTD LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02349
Plaintiff:
Paul D Cruz, Ariel Kumpinsky, Heather Smith and others
Defendant:
Resolute Capital Partners LTD LLC, Homebound Financial Group LP, HomeBound Resources LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
BUTLER v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02796
Plaintiff:
KIM BUTLER
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Winford Bryant
Defendant:
Kim Butler, Barack Obama and Nigel Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Kim Butler, Richard Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, David Childers, Salvador Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, A Johnson, Officer Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McGee et al
as 3:2018cv01517
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, M. Thompson, Kim Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Allory Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Hildreth v. Kim Butler, et al
as 18-2660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HILDRETH
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, LORI OAKLEY, MARVIN BOCHANTIN and others
Daniel Hamilton v. Kent Brookman, et al
as 18-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROBERT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT BROOKMAN, Lieutenant, TODD W. COWELL, KIM BUTLER and others
Rogelio Orozco v. Kim Butler, et al
as 18-1635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGELIO OROZCO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM BUTLER, MINN T. SCOTT, REBECCA COWAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
