Cases 41 - 50 of 162
EASLEY v. OPERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TABE BICKELL, DR. WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bankhead et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc et al
as 6:2020cv00690
Plaintiff:
Randal Childers, Stanley Dixon, Paula Cook and others
Defendant:
Big Sky Environmental LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv03062
Plaintiff:
Louise M. Smith and David Kim Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv02719
Plaintiff:
Louise M. Smith and David Kim Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Carson v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-1415
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM SMITH, (CHCA) Correct Care, KERI MOORE, Assistance Grievance Coordinator, LIEUTENANT DICKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH A. CARSON
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
Louise M. Smith and David Kim Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
ANGLE v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
ANGLE, II
Defendant:
JAMIE FADARCO, OBERLANDER, BLICKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANGLE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00371
Defendant:
DARIK OBERLANDER, MICHEAL OVERMYER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kodatt v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2019cv03252
Defendant:
. Waynescott, . Pierce, J B Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kodatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAESAR v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00276
Plaintiff:
LAMONT CAESAR
Defendant:
KIM SMITH, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NURSE MARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
