Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Coleman v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09046
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Coleman
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Coleman
as 23-770
Defendant / Appellant:
KIMBERLY DJAI COLEMAN and Kimberly Coleman
Not Yet Classified:
AZ PHOENIX LIBRARIAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv13831
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY COLEMAN
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00411
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
COLEMAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv00607
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SMITH and KIMBERLY COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doherty et al v. Good Shepherd Day School of Charlotte, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00638
Defendant:
Good Shepherd Day School of Charlotte, Inc. and GOOD SHEPHERD DAY SCHOOL OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY, INC.
Plaintiff:
Joleen Doherty and Kimberly Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
