Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Iyer v. Syndigo
as 26-20376
Plaintiff:
Mani Iyer
Defendant:
Syndigo, L.L.C., Anil Kini and Upendranath Varanasi
Andrews et al v. EnPro Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Odester Andrews, Brenda Annette Armstrong, Dorothy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
EnPro Industries, Inc., EnPro Holdings, Inc., Italmatch USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv10849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Goff v. ALK Asphalt LLC et al
as 2:2025cv04385
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Goff
Defendant:
ALK Asphalt LLC, Adam Kautman, Donald W Hudspeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartlett, et al. v. Hejazi, et al.
as 25-6217
Petitioner:
JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA, TYRIK DAWKINS and others
Respondent:
STATE OF OREGON
Movant:
HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI
Iyer v. Syndigo LLC, et al
as 4:2025cv02782
Plaintiff:
Mani Iyer
Defendant:
Anil Kini and Upendranath Varanasi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA, et al v. Tata Consultancy Services, LTD
as 24-7032
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Anil Kini and Anil Kini
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services, LTD
Betschart, et al. v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3573
Petitioner:
WALTER BETSCHART, JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA and others
Respondent:
PATRICK GARRETT, SHERIFF, Washington County Sheriff, in his official capacity and STATE OF OREGON
Betschart, et al. v. Washington County Circuit Court Judges, et al.
as 23-3560
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA, TYRIK DAWKINS and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
